[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140609130414.GB32192@esperanza>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:04:16 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
<rientjes@...gle.com>, <penberg@...nel.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<mhocko@...e.cz>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 8/8] slab: make dead memcg caches discard free
slabs immediately
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:52:17AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>
> > @@ -740,7 +740,8 @@ static void start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(int node, int entries,
> > +static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> > + int node, int entries,
> > int batchcount, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > int memsize = sizeof(void *) * entries + sizeof(struct array_cache);
>
> If you pass struct kmem_cache * into alloc_arraycache then we do not need
> to pass entries or batchcount because they are available in struct
> kmem_cache.
Seems you're right. Will rework.
> Otherwise this patch looks a bit too large to me. Simplify a bit?
Yeah, exactly. I will split it and resend.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists