[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpon3s3P2WE8oGiKgw8BU-3zGCPPjq=Bo9gAG4+7vVhTfdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:58:56 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@...il.com>,
david.vrabel@...rix.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hrtimers: add fast path to hrtimer_get_next_event
On 9 June 2014 18:29, Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru> wrote:
> In hrtimer_get_next_event we unconditionally lock/unlock spinlock, even if it's
> not required (hrtimer_hres_active() != 0). This patch adds fast path
> when highres is active so we don't execute unnecessary operations.
>
> We can safely do lockless check because:
> - hrtimer_get_next_event is always called with interrupts disabled;
> - we may switch to hres only from softirq handler with disabled interrupts.
>
> Because we only care about hres_active which may be changed only from
> local CPU, we can use interrupt context for synchronization.
>
> run_timer_softirq
> hrtimer_run_pending
> hrtimer_switch_to_hres
> local_irq_save <-
> base->hres_active = 0
>
> tick_nohz_idle_enter
> local_irq_disable <-
> __tick_nohz_idle_enter
> tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick
> get_next_timer_interrupt
> cmp_next_hrtimer_event
> hrtimer_get_next_event
> check base->hres_active
>
> irq_exit <- irq context
> tick_irq_exit
> tick_nohz_irq_exit
> tick_nohz_full_stop_tick
> tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick
> ... <see above>
> __tick_nohz_idle_enter
> ... <see above>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru>
> ---
> kernel/hrtimer.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
> index ba340739c701..731be91e927f 100644
> --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
> @@ -1167,23 +1167,24 @@ ktime_t hrtimer_get_next_event(void)
> unsigned long flags;
> int i;
>
> + if (hrtimer_hres_active())
> + return mindelta;
> +
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
>
> - if (!hrtimer_hres_active()) {
> - for (i = 0; i < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; i++, base++) {
> - struct hrtimer *timer;
> - struct timerqueue_node *next;
> + for (i = 0; i < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; i++, base++) {
> + struct hrtimer *timer;
> + struct timerqueue_node *next;
>
> - next = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active);
> - if (!next)
> - continue;
> + next = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active);
> + if (!next)
> + continue;
>
> - timer = container_of(next, struct hrtimer, node);
> - delta.tv64 = hrtimer_get_expires_tv64(timer);
> - delta = ktime_sub(delta, base->get_time());
> - if (delta.tv64 < mindelta.tv64)
> - mindelta.tv64 = delta.tv64;
> - }
> + timer = container_of(next, struct hrtimer, node);
> + delta.tv64 = hrtimer_get_expires_tv64(timer);
> + delta = ktime_sub(delta, base->get_time());
> + if (delta.tv64 < mindelta.tv64)
> + mindelta.tv64 = delta.tv64;
> }
>
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
Even I was concerned about a bigger diff earlier and so didn't comment
to rewrite it this way :)
Codewise, looks much better..
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists