linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] staging: ft1000: ft1000-usb: ft1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140609071615.GF5015@mwanda>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:16:15 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Thomas Wood <tommyandrena@...il.com>
Cc:	marek.belisko@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] staging: ft1000: ft1000-usb: ft1000_debug.c:
 Misc. fixes.

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 08:02:18PM -0700, Thomas Wood wrote:
> Remove initialization of static value.
> Invert the empty if statement's test to replace the else statement.
> Remove parentheses from a return statement.
> Fix some code indentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <tommyandrena@...il.com>
> ---
> 
> I'm pretty sure that the indentation was caused by a mistake by me earlier on in the patch set, so I'm fixing it now.
> 

No....  That's not the right thing.  If you cause the mistake earlier,
then redo the earlier patch.

Also I feel like fixing the indent here makes the patch into a "does too
many things in one go patch."  This patch is on the limit anyway.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/