linux-kernel - HID: hid-sensor-hub: fix sleeping function called from invalid context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53963364.4010104@ahsoftware.de>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:21:24 +0200
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: HID: hid-sensor-hub: fix sleeping function called from invalid context

Hello,

while rebasing the dozens (currently around 60) of refused, ignored or 
similiar bugfixes and patches I need to use a Linux kernel, I've noticed 
that Jiri Kosinas patch here

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/214

doesn't apply anymore.

Looking why, I've seen that a similiar patch from Srinivas Pandruvada 
named like the topic ended up in the kernel.

Looking at the differences, I wonder if not all spin_lock() calls in 
hid-sensor-hub.c should be changed into spin_lock_irqsave() like the 
patch from Jiri Kosina did.

Regards,

Alexander Holler

(sorry for the duplicate message, I've forgotten to add the 
wanna-be-reviewer-school named lkml to the recipients)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/