linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 34/78] sched/deadline: Change sched_getparam() behaviour vs SCHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140609224814.443200272@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon,  9 Jun 2014 15:48:14 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
	linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 34/78] sched/deadline: Change sched_getparam() behaviour vs SCHED_DEADLINE

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

commit ce5f7f8200ca2504f6f290044393d73ca314965a upstream.

The way we read POSIX one should only call sched_getparam() when
sched_getscheduler() returns either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.

Given that we currently return sched_param::sched_priority=0 for all
others, extend the same behaviour to SCHED_DEADLINE.

Requested-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>
Cc: linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140512205034.GH13467@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(sched_getscheduler, pid_
  */
 SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_getparam, pid_t, pid, struct sched_param __user *, param)
 {
-	struct sched_param lp;
+	struct sched_param lp = { .sched_priority = 0 };
 	struct task_struct *p;
 	int retval;
 
@@ -3752,11 +3752,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_getparam, pid_t, p
 	if (retval)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
-		retval = -EINVAL;
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
-	lp.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
+	if (task_has_rt_policy(p))
+		lp.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/