[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5396434D.3020402@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:29:17 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC regulators
Hello Mark,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 06/09/2014 09:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> + case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY: /* switch off */
>> + if (id != MAX77802_LDO1 && id != MAX77802_LDO20 &&
>> + id != MAX77802_LDO21 && id != MAX77802_LDO3) {
>> + val = MAX77802_OPMODE_STANDBY;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + /* no break */
>
> This sounds very broken...
>
The problem is that not all regulators supports the same operational modes. For
instance regulators LDO 1, 20, 21 and 3 does not support REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY
so if the condition is not met a break is not needed since the default case is
to warn that the mode is not supported.
But I'll rework that logic on v2 to make it cleaner and have a break on each
case and don't rely on case cascading.
>> + /* OK if some GPIOs aren't defined */
>> + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /* If a GPIO is valid, we'd better be able to claim it */
>> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, gpio, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
>> + "max77802 selb");
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't claim gpio[%d]: %d\n", i, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> Can this use the GPIO descriptor API?
>
Ok, I'll use gpiod_request() on v2.
>> +static void max77802_copy_reg(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap,
>> + int from_reg, int to_reg)
>> +{
>> + int val;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (from_reg == to_reg)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, from_reg, &val);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, to_reg, val);
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Copy err %d => %d (%d)\n",
>> + from_reg, to_reg, ret);
>> +}
>
> This doesn't look at all device specific, better implement it in generic
> code.
>
Ok, will do.
>> + if (pdata->num_regulators != MAX77802_MAX_REGULATORS) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Invalid initial data for regulator's initialiation: " \
>> + "expected %d, pdata/dt provided %d\n",
>> + MAX77802_MAX_REGULATORS,
>> + pdata->num_regulators);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Don't split log messages over multiple lines so people can find the log
> message in the kernel source with grep, though in any case checking for
> this is a bug - the driver should always be at least able to read the
> current state from the hardware.
>
Ok.
>> +static int __init max77802_pmic_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&max77802_pmic_driver);
>> +}
>> +subsys_initcall(max77802_pmic_init);
>
> module_platform_driver().
>
Ok.
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists