linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+5PVA6dHu-0qi1fx5Vq4QynJDJ=dG0feJjwoCHA3GaUSHp-FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jun 2014 19:35:57 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-audit@...hat.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
>> >> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> >>
>> >> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
>> >>
>> >> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
>> >>
>> >> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit
>> >> rules.  This bug has been around since before git.  Wow...
>> >>
>> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>> >>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Did this patch get dropped somewhere?  Isn't it a valid bugfix, or did I
>> > miss a later conversation about this?
>>
>> Hmm.  It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree.  Crap.
>>
>> IMO we need some kind of real tracking system for issues reported to
>> security@.
>
> That seems to be my mbox at times :)
>
> But yes, having something "real" might be good if the load gets higher,
> right now it's so low that my "sweep pending security patches" task
> usually catches anything pending, which is rare.

How does one get added to the security@ alias?  We've been carrying
this patch in Fedora for a bit now.  I'd be happy to help track things
given we get distro security bug reports and such.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/