[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAASgrz2=NA96ZZe8GRfnZ_m2woLc=QaAizj6yVA8Jgbi-O3rfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:41:45 -0700
From: David Riley <davidriley@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Riley <davidriley@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add test to validate udelay
Hi,
I was wondering if there were any comments to this patch or if it was
picked up somewhere?
Thanks,
Dave
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:30 PM, David Riley <davidriley@...omium.org> wrote:
> This change adds a module and a script that makes use of it to
> validate that udelay delays for at least as long as requested
> (as compared to ktime).
>
> Changes since v1:
> - allow udelay() to be 0.5% faster than requested as per feedback
>
> David Riley (2):
> kernel: time: Add udelay_test module to validate udelay
> tools: add script to test udelay
>
> kernel/time/Kconfig | 7 ++
> kernel/time/Makefile | 1 +
> kernel/time/udelay_test.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/time/udelay_test.sh | 66 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 kernel/time/udelay_test.c
> create mode 100644 tools/time/udelay_test.sh
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists