linux-kernel - Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v5 12/14] autoconf: xen: enable explicit preference option for xenstored preference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140610011558.GC6219@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 03:15:58 +0200
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To:	Cameron Norman <camerontnorman@...il.com>
Cc:	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>, luto@....edu,
	Keir Fraser <keir@....org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@....org>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@...citrix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	systemd-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, morgan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v5 12/14] autoconf: xen: enable
	explicit preference option for xenstored preference

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcgrof@...e.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
> >> > in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives on the
> >> > ExecStart= line of a systemd service unit file, alternative ideas are of
> >> > course welcomed. I'm also Cc'ing systemd-devel as this subject was reviewed
> >> > a little while ago with nothing concrete being recommended but instead a few
> >> > options being now archived as possibilities. I'm looking for a bit wider
> >> > review of the approaches and recomendations.
> >> >
> >> > Some general background for non xen folks: old xen requires the launch of
> >> > a daemon which implements supports of the xenstore, which is the database
> >> > that xen uses for information about guests / dom0. There are two supported
> >> > daemons, xenstored (C version) and oxenstored (Ocaml version) but they do the
> >> > same thing. Right now old init lets you override which one you pick through
> >> > an environment variable on /etc/{sysconfig,default}/xencommons, the script
> >> > will use the appropriate on there. Systemd doesn't let you use variables on
> >> > the ExecStart line of a service unit file so alternatives are required.
> >> >
> >> > The reason I'm being very careful here this could set a precedent and at
> >> > least for the launcher idea it'd require the usage of getenv() and execve(),
> >> > and secure alternatives for these (secure_getenv(), execve_nosecurity())
> >> > have either been merged or suggested before for Linux. The systemd discussion
> >> > is only specific to Linux but if we have a launcher we could consider it for
> >> > other supported OSes. All that said I'd like proper review of the security
> >> > implications of *all* strategies but obviously in particular the launcher
> >> > idea. I want to tread carefuly before setting precedents.
> >>
> >> You can also just invoke a shell script from ExecStart=. I mean, we try
> >> to deemphesize them in the boot process, but there's nothing wrong with
> >> using shell, if you need to parse shell configuraiton fragments and just
> >> want to execute on ot another program...
> >
> > I tried this and it didn't work given that systemd expects sd_notify()
> > to be called from the parent process, in this case the shell script.
> 
> Just use exec before the daemon command. I am pretty certain it can be
> just like this:
> 
>     ExecStart=/bin/sh -c "exec $XENSTORED"
> 
> xenstored then has the same PID as the sh process, and $NOTIFY_SOCKET
> works just fine.

Actually this does work on a test unit I just built. I'll proceed with
this approach since I haven't heard back from others and I think
this is the best approach now.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/