linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] block: make nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:50:36 +0800
From:	Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:	andi@...as.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: make nr_requests tunable for loop

On 06/10/2014 10:41 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2014-06-09 20:31, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>> commit 7b5a3522 (loop: Limit the number of requests in the bio list)
>> limit
>> the request number in loop queue to not over 128. Since the
>> "request_fn" of
>> loop device is null, the requests number is not allowed tuned. Make
>> it tunable
>> from sysfs can improve performance.
>>
>> The following test is done on a machine with 512M memory. The backend of
>> /dev/loop1 is a nfs file.
>>
>> [root@...x mnt]# cat /sys/block/loop0/queue/nr_requests
>> 128
>> [root@...x mnt]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/loop0 bs=1M count=5000
>> 5000+0 records in
>> 5000+0 records out
>> 5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 501.572 s, 10.5 MB/s
>> [root@...x mnt]#
>> [root@...x mnt]# echo 1024 > /sys/block/loop0/queue/nr_requests
>> [root@...x mnt]# cat /sys/block/loop0/queue/nr_requests
>> 1024
>> [root@...x mnt]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/loop0 bs=1M count=5000
>> 5000+0 records in
>> 5000+0 records out
>> 5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 464.481 s, 11.3 MB/s
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
>> ---
>>   block/blk-core.c  |    6 ++++++
>>   block/blk-sysfs.c |    9 +++------
>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 40d6548..58c4bd4 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -851,6 +851,12 @@ int blk_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue
>> *q, unsigned int nr)
>>       q->nr_requests = nr;
>>       blk_queue_congestion_threshold(q);
>>
>> +    /* for loop device, return after set its nr_requests */
>> +    if (!q->request_fn) {
>> +        spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> +        return 0;
>> +    }
>
> It'd be prettier to split this differently - something ala:
>
> if (request_fn)
>         blk_update_congestion_thresholds(q);
The congestion threshholds is needed in commit 7b5a3522 (loop: Limit the
number of requests in the bio list). So I think it needs be set even
request_fn is null.
>
> But I think you have a larger issue here... For the request lists, we
> update the congestion thresholds and wakeup anyone waiting, if we need
> to. There's no way to do that for loop, since the waitqueue is
> internal to loop.
Loop do the congestion control by itself, in loop_make_request() /
loop_thread().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/