Message-id: <1402385558.6989.11.camel@AMDC1943>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:32:38 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add Maxim 77802 PMIC support

On pon, 2014-06-09 at 09:04 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Krzystof,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > On pon, 2014-06-09 at 11:37 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> MAX77802 is a PMIC that contains 10 high efficiency Buck regulators,
> >> 32 Low-dropout (LDO) regulators, two 32kHz buffered clock outputs,
> >> a Real-Time-Clock (RTC) and a I2C interface to program the individual
> >> regulators, clocks and the RTC.
> >>
> >> This series are based on drivers added by Simon Glass to the Chrome OS
> >> kernel and adds support for the Maxim 77802 Power Management IC, their
> >> regulators, clocks, RTC and I2C interface. It is composed of patches:
> >>
> >> [PATCH 1/5] mfd: Add driver for Maxim 77802 Power Management IC
> >> [PATCH 2/5] regulator: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC regulators
> >> [PATCH 3/5] clk: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC clocks
> >> [PATCH 4/5] rtc: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC Real-Time-Clock
> >> [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: Add max77802 device node for exynos5420-peach-pit
> >>
> >> Patches 1-4 add support for the different devices and Patch 5 enables
> >> the MAX77802 PMIC on the Exynos5420 based Peach pit board.
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The main mfd, mfd irq, clk and rtc drivers look very similar to max77686
> > drivers. I haven't checked other Maxim drivers but I think there will be
> > a lot of similarities with them also. It is almost common for Maxim
> > chipsets to share components between each other.
> >
> > I think there is no need in duplicating all that stuff once again in new
> > driver for another Maxim-almost-the-same-as-others-XYZ chipset. Just
> > merge it with max77686 (or other better candidate).
> >
> > The only difference is in regulator driver. I am not sure whether this
> > is a result of differences in chip or differences in driver design.
> 
> Yes, we thought the same thing when we added support for the max77802
> in the ChromeOS tree.  Unfortunately it didn't work out half as well
> as we thought it would.  When Javier was asking advice about sending
> things upstream we suggested that perhaps he should split the two up.
> 
> 
> You can see the result of the combined driver the ChromeOS tree (the
> code there is older, probably misnamed as max77xxx, and doesn't have
> the proper clock pieces, but you can get the gist):
> 
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/regulator/max77xxx-regulator.c
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77xxx.c
> 
> 
> Specific problems that made it ugly to have a combined driver:
> 
> * The RTC has many subtle differences between the 77686 and 77802.
> They expanded it to handle a 200 year timeframe instead of 100 and
> that meant that they had to shuffle the bits around everywhere.  They
> also moved it to have the same i2c address as the main PMIC so all
> addresses are different (see max77686_map in the RTC link above).

The difference in RTC registers seems the biggest but it can be solved
in readable manner. I see other differences but there aren't many. It
just hurts seeing so much code duplication:
$ sed -e 's/max77686/max77802/g' -e 's/MAX77686/MAX77802/g' \
  -i drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
$ diff -ubB drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c drivers/rtc/rtc-max77802.c

The combined RTC driver from ChromeOS seems fine to me... but I do not
insist.

> * The regulator itself has similar concepts between the two, but the
> list of bucks / ldos and how they behave is quite different.  Trying
> to understand the complex tables in
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/regulator/max77xxx-regulator.c>
> was not easy.
> 
> 
> If we really need to write a single driver it certainly can be done,
> but please look at the above to be sure this is what you want.

Sure, I don't stick to the idea of one merged driver where this
increases code size and complexity. I see your point that merging
regulator drivers won't bring benefits but please:
$ sed -e 's/max77686/max77802/g' -e 's/MAX77686/MAX77802/g' \
  -i drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c
$ diff -ubB drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c drivers/clk/clk-max77802.c

The difference in number of clocks (2 vs 3) is not an obstacle here.

The same applies to main MFD driver and IRQ code. However MAX77686
doesn't use regmap_irq_chip so it needs changes before merging the IRQ
code into one piece.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> NOTE: it's possible that things could be more sane with more driver
> redesign, possibly making things more data driven.  The thing that
> would be really nice to do would be to avoid all of the crazy
> "regulator_zzz_desc_zzz" macros, maybe?  I'd have to actually try
> doing it to be sure it's cleaner, though...
> 
> 
> -Doug

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists