[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5396FED1.2060802@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:49:21 +0300
From: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, jwboyer@...hat.com, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: validate key trust with owner and builtin keys
only
On 10/06/14 15:45, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 11:48 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> Hi Mimi,
>>
>> As you asked ofline , here is possible equivalent and simpler alternative
>> patches not requiring to have additional keyring.
> Please indicate which branch these patches apply to.
>
> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>
>
on the top of your tree #next-trusted-keys-experimental, excluding 1/4
patch, which is yours.
I included it by mistake because patches were on the top of that and I
used HEAD~3 instead of HEAD~2 to send them...
- Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists