[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4504625.aXgUF2A4Cb@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:04:47 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove soc_is_exynos4/5 from exynos.c
On Tuesday 10 June 2014 15:55:09 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 10.05.2014 09:20, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > This patch removes usage of soc_is_exynos4/5 from exynos.c.
> > For this we need to separate machine descriptors for exynos4
> > and exynos5. While doing this patch does some consolidation also.
> >
> > CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > CC: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 3 --
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
>
> I don't think this is needed. All those static mappings should just go
> away, which will also eliminate the need to have separate machine
> descriptor or soc_is_exynos{4,5}() macros.
I think I suggested doing this patch as an intermediate step to
get rid of the macros first, so we don't get any new users.
I agree that we should also remove the static mappings eventually,
and once we do that, the machine descriptors can be unified again.
I have not checked which of the map_desc entries are currently used
at all, or what it would take to remove them.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists