linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1447217.dTmMAkaUnF@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:31:38 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
Cc:	Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Trivial code cleanup

On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 08:12:48 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 02:01 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> > Remove unnecessary blank lines.
> > Remove unnecessary parentheses.
> > Remove unnecessary braces.
> > Put the code in one line where possible.
> > Add blank lines after variable declarations.
> > Alignment to open parenthesis.
> >
> 
> I don't have an issue with this patch in general but I would rather
> the cleanup be done when there is a functional change in the given
> hunk of code otherwise you are setting up a fence for stable/backporters
> of functional changes in the future.

I actually prefer separate cleanups so as to avoid doing multiple things
in one patch.

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/