[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53972CE1.1060209@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:05:53 -0700
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
CC: dirk.brandewie@...il.com,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid duplicate call of intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy
On 06/09/2014 02:00 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Store busy_scaled value to avoid to duplicate call of
> intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy on every sampling interval.
>
The second call *only* happens if the tracepoint is being used otherwise
the whole function call to trace_pstate_sample() is a noop.
This makes the code less readable IMHO the reader is left wondering
how cpu->sample.busy_scaled was set in intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate()
> Also, rename the function to intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 4e7f492..31e2ae5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static inline int32_t div_fp(int32_t x, int32_t y)
>
> struct sample {
> int32_t core_pct_busy;
> + int32_t busy_scaled;
> u64 aperf;
> u64 mperf;
> int freq;
> @@ -604,7 +605,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_set_sample_time(struct cpudata *cpu)
> mod_timer_pinned(&cpu->timer, jiffies + delay);
> }
>
> -static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
> +static inline void intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
> {
> int32_t core_busy, max_pstate, current_pstate, sample_ratio;
> u32 duration_us;
> @@ -624,20 +625,19 @@ static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
> core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, sample_ratio);
> }
>
> - return core_busy;
> + cpu->sample.busy_scaled = core_busy;
> }
>
> static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
> {
> - int32_t busy_scaled;
> struct _pid *pid;
> signed int ctl = 0;
> int steps;
>
> pid = &cpu->pid;
> - busy_scaled = intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu);
> + intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(cpu);
>
> - ctl = pid_calc(pid, busy_scaled);
> + ctl = pid_calc(pid, cpu->sample.busy_scaled);
>
> steps = abs(ctl);
>
> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_timer_func(unsigned long __data)
> intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
>
> trace_pstate_sample(fp_toint(sample->core_pct_busy),
> - fp_toint(intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu)),
> + fp_toint(sample->busy_scaled),
> cpu->pstate.current_pstate,
> sample->mperf,
> sample->aperf,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists