lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1402429600-20477-141-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:46:20 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 140/160] drm/nouveau/acpi: allow non-optimus setups to load vbios from acpi

3.13.11.3 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>

commit a3d0b1218d351c6e6f3cea36abe22236a08cb246 upstream.

There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not
available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI.
The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid
instructions (still has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk
way to try to obtain a valid vbios image.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
index ba0183f..d3c7646 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
@@ -423,9 +423,6 @@ bool nouveau_acpi_rom_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	acpi_status status;
 	acpi_handle dhandle, rom_handle;
 
-	if (!nouveau_dsm_priv.dsm_detected && !nouveau_dsm_priv.optimus_detected)
-		return false;
-
 	dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
 	if (!dhandle)
 		return false;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ