[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1406101458470.4699@AMR>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:10:16 -0600 (MDT)
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Matias Bjørling <m@...rling.me>,
"willy@...ux.intel.com" <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"sbradshaw@...ron.com" <sbradshaw@...ron.com>,
"tom.leiming@...il.com" <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] NVMe: conversion to blk-mq
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/10/2014 01:29 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>> I have two devices, one formatted 4k, the other 512. The 4k is used as
>> the TEST_DEV and 512 is used as SCRATCH_DEV. I'm always hitting a BUG when
>> unmounting the scratch dev in xfstests generic/068. The bug looks like
>> nvme was trying to use an SGL that doesn't map correctly to a PRP.
>
> I'm guessing it's some of the coalescing settings, since the driver is
> now using the generic block rq mapping.
Ok, sounds right. I mentioned in a way earlier review it doesn't look
like a request that doesn't conform to a PRP list would get split anymore,
and this test seems to confirm that.
Can we create something that will allow a driver to add DMA constraints to
a request queue with the rules of a PRP list?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists