[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53977688.5080802@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:20:08 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Seth Bollinger <sethb@...i.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.15: SPARC serial console regression
Hi Sam,
On 06/10/2014 03:24 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 19:21:43 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] serial: sunsab: Test for no tx data on tx restart
>>
>> Commit 717f3bbab3c7628736ef738fdbf3d9a28578c26c,
>> 'serial_core: Fix conditional start_tx on ring buffer not empty'
>> exposes an incorrect assumption in sunsab's start_tx method; the
>> tx ring buffer can, in fact, be empty when restarting tx when
>> performing flow control.
>>
>> Test for empty tx ring buffer when in sunsab's start_tx method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
>
> Hi Peter.
>
> Can you please take a look at sunzilog.c.
> It looks like the same test is missing in sunzilog_start_tx():
Yeah, when I saw that yesterday, I put
* audit uart drivers' start_tx() methods
on my TODO list.
> } else {
> struct circ_buf *xmit = &port->state->xmit;
>
> writeb(xmit->buf[xmit->tail], &channel->data);
> ZSDELAY();
> ZS_WSYNC(channel);
>
> xmit->tail = (xmit->tail + 1) & (UART_XMIT_SIZE - 1);
> port->icount.tx++;
>
> if (uart_circ_chars_pending(xmit) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
> uart_write_wakeup(&up->port);
> }
>
>
> I did not review all drives - only a few sun drivers
> and this was the only one that occured to me also
> required this check.
>
> I also noticed the typical pattern is:
>
> if (uart_circ_empty(xmit) || uart_tx_stopped(port))
>
> Should you use this pattern also in sunsab.c?
What a mess.
uart_tx_stopped() _should_ be redundant for the start_tx() method.
However, I see that uart_resume_port() doesn't check either flow state
and uart_handle_cts_change() doesn't check the soft-flow state.
The semantics of the start_tx() method should be 'tx may commence; begin
xmitting if data is ready'. Except in the case where send_xchar() is not
supported by the uart driver. <sigh>
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists