linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm, compaction: report compaction as contended only due to lock contention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm, compaction: report compaction as contended
 only due to lock contention

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> > > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> > > index b73b182..d37f4a8 100644
> > > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > > @@ -185,9 +185,14 @@ static void update_pageblock_skip(struct
> > > compact_control *cc,
> > >   }
> > >   #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
> > > 
> > > -static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> > > +enum compact_contended should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> > >   {
> > > -	return need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock);
> > > +	if (need_resched())
> > > +		return COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
> > > +	else if (spin_is_contended(lock))
> > > +		return COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
> > > +	else
> > > +		return COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
> > >   }
> > > 
> > >   /*
> > 
> > I think eventually we're going to remove the need_resched() heuristic
> > entirely and so enum compact_contended might be overkill, but do we need
> > to worry about spin_is_contended(lock) && need_resched() reporting
> > COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED here instead of COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK?
> 
> Hm right, maybe I should reorder the two tests.
> 

Yes, please.

> > > @@ -202,7 +207,9 @@ static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t
> > > *lock)
> > >   static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long
> > > *flags,
> > >   				      bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> > >   {
> > > -	if (should_release_lock(lock)) {
> > > +	enum compact_contended contended = should_release_lock(lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (contended) {
> > >   		if (locked) {
> > >   			spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> > >   			locked = false;
> > > @@ -210,7 +217,7 @@ static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t
> > > *lock, unsigned long *flags,
> > > 
> > >   		/* async aborts if taking too long or contended */
> > >   		if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> > > -			cc->contended = true;
> > > +			cc->contended = contended;
> > >   			return false;
> > >   		}
> > > 
> > > @@ -236,7 +243,7 @@ static inline bool compact_should_abort(struct
> > > compact_control *cc)
> > >   	/* async compaction aborts if contended */
> > >   	if (need_resched()) {
> > >   		if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> > > -			cc->contended = true;
> > > +			cc->contended = COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
> > >   			return true;
> > >   		}
> > > 
> > > @@ -1095,7 +1102,8 @@ static unsigned long compact_zone_order(struct zone
> > > *zone, int order,
> > >   	VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc.freepages));
> > >   	VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc.migratepages));
> > > 
> > > -	*contended = cc.contended;
> > > +	/* We only signal lock contention back to the allocator */
> > > +	*contended = cc.contended == COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
> > >   	return ret;
> > >   }
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm, since the only thing that matters for cc->contended is
> > COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK, it may make sense to just leave this as a bool
> > within struct compact_control instead of passing the actual reason around
> > when it doesn't matter.
> 
> That's what I thought first. But we set cc->contended in
> isolate_freepages_block() and then check it in isolate_freepages() and
> compaction_alloc() to make sure we don't continue the free scanner once
> contention (or need_resched()) is detected. And introducing an enum, even if
> temporary measure, seemed simpler than making that checking more complex. This
> way it can stay the same once we get rid of need_resched().
> 

Ok, we can always reconsider it later after need_resched() is removed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/