[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140610234737.6562.43399@quantum>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:47:37 -0700
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Chris Ball" <chris@...ntf.net>, "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates for 3.16-rc1
Quoting Linus Torvalds (2014-06-10 14:50:59)
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net> wrote:
> >
> > These patches have been tested in
> > linux-next, and there are three minor conflicts which I've resolved on
> > my mmc-updates-for-3.16-rc1-merged branch.
>
> Your merged branch is incorrect as far as I can tell, and dropped
> commit a8246fedacad ("dmaengine: omap: hide filter_fn for built-in
> drivers").
>
> And I'm not sure why the sunxi driver (by David Lanzendörfer) and the
> Realtek driver (by Roger Tseng) got merged in two different trees.
> It's clearly the same patches and drivers, but I got them first
> through the MFD tree (Realtek) and the clock tree (sunxi) trees and
> now the MMC tree.
Bummer. The sunxi mmc driver came through the clock tree to handle a
linux-next merge issue. Pics or it didn't happen:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/696
Regards,
Mike
>
> Don't you guys talk to each other? The Realtek driver is even marked
> as Acked-by Chris Ball in the MFD tree.
>
> Also, that new drivers/mmc/host/usdhi6rol0.c driver is one f*cking
> noisy compile, and knisr certainly has never been tested in a 64-bit
> environment. Please either fix it, or make it depend on BROKEN.
>
> Grr.
>
> Anyway, pulled, merged correctly, and pushed out..
>
> Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists