[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1t38fb3lbc.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:24:55 +0200
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] DMA, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
On Tue, Jun 10 2014, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> Without including device.h, build failure occurs.
> In dma-contiguous.h, we try to access to dev->cma_area, so we need
> device.h. In the past, we included it luckily by swap.h in
> drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c. Swap.h includes node.h and then node.h
> includes device.h, so we were happy. But, in this patch, I remove
> 'include <linux/swap.h>' so we need to include device.h explicitly.
Ack.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@...gle.com>--<xmpp:mina86@...ber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists