lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140611113616.5fc973f1@kant>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:36:16 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firewire: ohci: enable MSI for VIA VT6315 rev 1,
 drop cycle timer quirk

On Jun 11 Stefan Richter wrote:
> Nice -- yesterday, just a few days after this patch went into the
> mainline, this VT6315 card suddenly stopped to generate any interrupt
> while being in use with a soundcard and jackd.  Until then it ran
> perfectly for many days, with jackd+ffado's combined workload of
> AT/AR/IT/IR but also with SBP-2 workloads and one or another other
> application as well.
> 
> Now I apparently need to run long-term tests with MSI switched off in order
> to find out whether this malfunction is MSI related.

PS, this is the state of the card just now after this failure:

10:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6315 Series Firewire Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
        Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6315 Series Firewire Controller
        Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 74

$ grep "74:" /proc/interrupts 
 74:  132906417   17969317   15309448   18166551   42716375   33292391   30609551   28301206   PCI-MSI-edge      firewire_ohci

I am used to defective MSI support manifesting itself right after driver
initialization, not after long periods of use with, say, 319271256 proper
interrupts before it goes belly-up.  And indeed, the issue with VT6315
rev 0 was an instantaneous malfunction, not a rare and random one
(http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-12/msg02301.html).
I wonder what's up with my VT6315 rev 1.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-====- -==- -=-==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ