[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1402479861.3798.63.camel@x220>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:44:21 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [linux-next] arm64: ftrace: Fix comment typo
'CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST'
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
---
Untested.
This typo was added in next-20140603. I've had this patch queued for
over a week because I wanted to understand the comment I'm touching
here. I still don't. But I figured that making sure that this comment
uses the Kconfig macro that apparently was intended, ought to be enough
to submit this.
arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
index b051871f2965..aa5f9fcbf9ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ ENDPROC(ftrace_graph_caller)
*
* Run ftrace_return_to_handler() before going back to parent.
* @fp is checked against the value passed by ftrace_graph_caller()
- * only when CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST is enabled.
+ * only when CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST is enabled.
*/
ENTRY(return_to_handler)
str x0, [sp, #-16]!
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists