lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:58:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org> To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com> cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: numa: drop ZONE_ALIGN On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > The zone should not cross the 8M boundary? > > Yes, but the question is: why? zones need to be aligned so that the huge pages order and other page orders allocated from the page allocator are at their "natural alignment". Otherwise huge pages cannot be mapped properly and various I/O devices may encounter issues if they rely on the natural alignment. > My current thinking, after discussing this with David, is to just page > align the memory range. This should fix the hyperv-triggered bug in 2.6.32 > and seems to be the right thing for upstream too. You need to make sure that the page orders can be allocated at their proper boundaries. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists