[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1402519793.612.88.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:49:53 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, jwboyer@...hat.com, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: validate key trust with owner and builtin
keys only
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 15:49 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> On 10/06/14 15:45, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 11:48 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> >> Hi Mimi,
> >>
> >> As you asked ofline , here is possible equivalent and simpler alternative
> >> patches not requiring to have additional keyring.
> > Please indicate which branch these patches apply to.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Mimi
> >
> >
>
> on the top of your tree #next-trusted-keys-experimental, excluding 1/4
> patch, which is yours.
> I included it by mistake because patches were on the top of that and I
> used HEAD~3 instead of HEAD~2 to send them...
This patch set removes the separate 'owner' trusted keyring. Please
rebase your patches without the HEAD patch - "f5b4ced KEYS: define an
owner trusted keyring" and re-post.
thanks,
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists