[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5398D7B4.5000303@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:27:00 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] x86,seccomp: Add a seccomp fastpath
On 06/11/2014 03:22 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 06/11/2014 02:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> 13ns is with the simplest nonempty filter. I hope that empty filters
>>> don't work.
>>>
>>
>> Why wouldn't they?
>
> Is it permissible to fall off the end of a BPF program? I'm getting
> EINVAL trying to install an actual empty filter. The filter I tested
> with was:
>
What I meant was that there has to be a well-defined behavior for the
program falling off the end anyway, and that that should be preserved.
I guess it is possible to require that all code paths must provably
reach a termination point.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists