[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1402459804.5195.19.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:10:04 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] rt/aio: fix rcu garbage collection might_sleep()
splat
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:50 -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:47:28AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 10:08 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > > Hi, rt-people
> > >
> > > I don't think it is the correct direction.
> > > Softirq (including local_bh_disable()) in RT kernel should be preemptible.
> >
> > How about the below then?
> >
> > I was sorely tempted to post a tiny variant that dropped taking ctx_lock
> > in free_ioctx_users() entirely, as someone diddling with no reference
> > didn't make sense. Cc Ben, he would know.
>
> That should be okay... Let's ask Kent to chime in on whether this looks
> safe to him on the percpu ref front as well, since he's the one who wrote
> this code.
Looking at the gizzard of our in-tree user of kiocb_set_cancel_fn()
(gadget), cancel() leads to dequeue() methods, which take other sleeping
locks, so tiniest variant is not an option, patchlet stands.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists