lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1402461178.24669.40.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:32:58 +1000
From:	wmealing <wmealing@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	wmealing@...hat.com
Subject: Counting currently open file descriptors per process.

Gday,

I'm seeking some guidance on how to best (or if) to implement a feature.
 
Please CC me on any reply, I am not subscribed to this list.

The feature is, "an application would like to know how many files another 
process has open".

>From user space, the cheapest way  would be to use the call
syscall(SYS_getdents ...) in the proc/pid/fd directory. 

Alternatively from kernel space one could achieve a similar behavior by
iterating through the tasks fdtable, as i have attempted to here:

https://gist.github.com/wmealing/c0836bc6a38f8f90aa0d

Colleagues of mine have pointed out that this may have performance 
impacts for tools that frequently parse /proc/pid/status.

I have compiled a kernel with the above patch and here are the performance stats.

System settings
# sysctl -w fs.file-max=5000000
fs.file-max = 5000000

Increase this sessions limits.
# ulimit -n 1000000

test.py had 500002 files open each time.

Here are some of the performance benchmarks on an idle
system: 

# time cat /proc/`pidof python test.py`/status |grep FD
FDSize:	524288
FDCount: 500002

real	0m0.008s
user	0m0.002s
sys	0m0.004s

# time ./test-getdents /proc/`pidof python test.py`/fd &> /dev/null 

real	0m0.631s
user	0m0.001s
sys	0m0.485s

or this time with readdir(3)

# time ./test-opendir /proc/`pidof python test.py`/fd &> /dev/null

real	0m0.129s
user	0m0.001s
sys	0m0.007s

(which oddly seems faster?)

My benchmark values above are not meant for micro-benchmarking 
but rather as a scale to know how far behind the code is.

Is the current method of getting a live fd count acceptable, if 
not how should it be done ?

Thanks for your time.

Wade Mealing.

[1] https://github.com/wmealing/live-fd-count/  
git repo with code used in the above.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ