[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53995F27.4050308@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:04:55 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@...driver.com>
CC: vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem
On 06/12/2014 04:53 AM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> Consider the scenario:
> For a TCP-style socket, while processing the COOKIE_ECHO chunk in
> sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(), after it has passed a series of sanity check,
> a new association would be created in sctp_unpack_cookie(), but afterwards,
> some processing maybe failed, and sctp_association_free() will be called to
> free the previously allocated association, in sctp_association_free(),
> sk_ack_backlog value is decremented for this socket, since the initial
> value for sk_ack_backlog is 0, after the decrement, it will be 65535,
> a wrap-around problem happens, and if we want to establish new associations
> afterward in the same socket, ABORT would be triggered since sctp deem the
> accept queue as full.
> Fix this issue by only decrementing sk_ack_backlog for associations in
> the endpoint's list.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@...driver.com>
Looks good to me, thanks. This also needs to go to -stable.
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists