[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140612100344.GB19221@esperanza>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:03:46 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <cl@...ux.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<penberg@...nel.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>, <mhocko@...e.cz>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 5/8] slub: make slab_free non-preemptable
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:58:42PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 05:22:42PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > @@ -2673,18 +2673,11 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
> >
> > slab_free_hook(s, x);
> >
> > -redo:
> > - /*
> > - * Determine the currently cpus per cpu slab.
> > - * The cpu may change afterward. However that does not matter since
> > - * data is retrieved via this pointer. If we are on the same cpu
> > - * during the cmpxchg then the free will succedd.
> > - */
> > preempt_disable();
>
> Could you add some code comment why this preempt_disable/enable() is
> needed? We don't have any clue that kmemcg depends on these things
> on code, so someone cannot understand why it is here.
>
> If possible, please add similar code comment on slab_alloc in mm/slab.c.
Sure.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists