[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201406122053.CHI48403.HQFMOVFOFSLJOt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:53:38 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: john.stultz@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
takedakn@...data.co.jp, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 13/13] tomoyo: Use sensible time interface
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> There is no point in calling gettimeofday if only the seconds part of
> the timespec is used. Use get_seconds() instead. It's not only the
> proper interface it's also faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>
> Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
John Stultz wrote:
> do_gettimeofday() { 99, 888....}
> get_seconds() { 99 }
> do_gettimeofday() { 99, 999....}
> get_seconds() { 99 }
> do_gettimeofday() { 100, 000....}
> get_seconds() { 99 }
> do_gettimeofday() { 100, 011....}
> get_seconds() { 100 }
That will be acceptable error for TOMOYO. Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists