[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5398FFDA.5050601@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:18:18 +0800
From: baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xhci: clear root port wake on bits if controller
isn't wake-up capable
On 06/11/2014 11:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:25:20AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> When the xHCI PCI host is suspended, if do_wakeup is false in xhci_pci_suspend,
>> xhci_bus_suspend needs to clear all root port wake on bits. Otherwise some Intel
>> platform may get a spurious wakeup, even if PCI PME# is disabled.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=138194006009255&w=2
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Should this also be a stable kernel patch? If so, how far back?
Yes.
This patch should be back-ported to kernels as old as 2.6.37, that
contains the commit 9777e3ce907d4cb5a513902a87ecd03b52499569
"USB: xHCI: bus power management implementation".
Thanks,
-baolu
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists