linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/14] scsi: convert target_busy to an atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:48:58 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@...ionio.com>,
	Robert Elliot <Elliott@...com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/14] scsi: convert target_busy to an atomic_t

Avoid taking the host-wide host_lock to check the per-target queue limit.
Instead we do an atomic_inc_return early on to grab our slot in the queue,
and if nessecary decrement it after finishing all checks.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c    |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 include/scsi/scsi_device.h |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 3d90340..9e288e6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ void scsi_device_unbusy(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
 	shost->host_busy--;
-	starget->target_busy--;
+	atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
 	if (unlikely(scsi_host_in_recovery(shost) &&
 		     (shost->host_failed || shost->host_eh_scheduled)))
 		scsi_eh_wakeup(shost);
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static inline int scsi_device_is_busy(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 static inline int scsi_target_is_busy(struct scsi_target *starget)
 {
 	return ((starget->can_queue > 0 &&
-		 starget->target_busy >= starget->can_queue) ||
+		 atomic_read(&starget->target_busy) >= starget->can_queue) ||
 		 starget->target_blocked);
 }
 
@@ -1305,37 +1305,49 @@ static inline int scsi_target_queue_ready(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
 					   struct scsi_device *sdev)
 {
 	struct scsi_target *starget = scsi_target(sdev);
-	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned int busy;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
 	if (starget->single_lun) {
+		spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
 		if (starget->starget_sdev_user &&
-		    starget->starget_sdev_user != sdev)
-			goto out;
+		    starget->starget_sdev_user != sdev) {
+			spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+			return 0;
+		}
 		starget->starget_sdev_user = sdev;
+		spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
 	}
 
-	if (starget->target_busy == 0 && starget->target_blocked) {
+	busy = atomic_inc_return(&starget->target_busy) - 1;
+	if (busy == 0 && starget->target_blocked) {
 		/*
 		 * unblock after target_blocked iterates to zero
 		 */
-		if (--starget->target_blocked != 0)
-			goto out;
+		spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+		if (--starget->target_blocked != 0) {
+			spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+			goto out_dec;
+		}
+		spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
 
 		SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, starget_printk(KERN_INFO, starget,
 				 "unblocking target at zero depth\n"));
 	}
 
-	if (scsi_target_is_busy(starget)) {
-		list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry, &shost->starved_list);
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (starget->can_queue > 0 && busy >= starget->can_queue)
+		goto starved;
+	if (starget->target_blocked)
+		goto starved;
 
-	scsi_target(sdev)->target_busy++;
-	ret = 1;
-out:
+	return 1;
+
+starved:
+	spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+	list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry, &shost->starved_list);
 	spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
-	return ret;
+out_dec:
+	atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1445,7 +1457,7 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct request *req, struct request_queue *q)
 	spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
 	spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
 	shost->host_busy++;
-	starget->target_busy++;
+	atomic_inc(&starget->target_busy);
 	spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
 	spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
 
@@ -1615,9 +1627,7 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 	return;
 
  host_not_ready:
-	spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
-	scsi_target(sdev)->target_busy--;
-	spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+	atomic_dec(&scsi_target(sdev)->target_busy);
  not_ready:
 	/*
 	 * lock q, handle tag, requeue req, and decrement device_busy. We
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index 5853c91..560847b 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -290,8 +290,8 @@ struct scsi_target {
 	unsigned int		expecting_lun_change:1;	/* A device has reported
 						 * a 3F/0E UA, other devices on
 						 * the same target will also. */
-	/* commands actually active on LLD. protected by host lock. */
-	unsigned int		target_busy;
+	/* commands actually active on LLD. */
+	atomic_t		target_busy;
 	/*
 	 * LLDs should set this in the slave_alloc host template callout.
 	 * If set to zero then there is not limit.
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/