linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1402581459.15402.54.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:57:39 -0400
From:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix MAX_ORDER for 64K pagesize

On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:04 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
> 
> > Any reason to not switch this to
> > 
> > 	ARM64_64K_PAGES && TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE && CMA
> > 
> 
> (ARM64_64K_PAGES) && (TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || CMA)

And add HUGETLB to the list also? I'm not sure of all the trade offs
here, so I kept it simple. I don't have a strong opinion one way or
the other.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/