[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140612015139.21573.qmail@ns.horizon.com>
Date: 11 Jun 2014 21:51:39 -0400
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To: hpa@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...izon.com, mingo@...nel.org, price@....edu, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: drivers/char/random.c: More futzing about
> Sadly I can't find the tree, but I'm 94% sure it was Skein-256
> (specifically the SHA3-256 candidate parameter set.)
It would be nice to have two hash functions, optimized separately for 32-
and 64-bit processors. As the Skein report says, the algorithm can
be adapted to 32 bits easily enough.
I also did some work a while ago to adapt the Skein parameter search
code to develop a Skein-192 (6x32 bits) that would fit into registers
on x86-32. (It got stalled when I e-mailed Niels Ferguson about it
and never heard back; it fell off the to-do list while I was waiting.)
The intended target was IPv6 address hashing for sequence number
randomization, but it could be used for pool hashing, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists