[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1406121358390.8305@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
cc: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Diehl <thorsten.diehl@...ibm.com>,
"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: proc/stat: use usual seq_file ops rather than
single_open
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Yes, that doesn't make any sense. I wrote the patch together in a hurry and
> didn't think much about it.
> So below is the what I think most simple conversion to a vmalloc fallback
> approach for seq files. However the question remains if this seems to be an
> acceptable approach at all...
>
I think the approach is fine. We do now have a generic kvfree() function
defined in mm.h that will handle the freeing, though, determined by
is_vmalloc_addr() so seq_free() is no longer necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists