linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/13] kexec: Implementation of new syscall kexec_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140613082459.GL15034@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:24:59 +0800
From:	WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	mjg59@...f.ucam.org, bhe@...hat.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
	greg@...ah.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] kexec: Implementation of new syscall
 kexec_file_load

On 06/13/14 at 10:10am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:00:28PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> > By greping for COMMAND_LINE_SIZE for different arch, I think 8K being
> > the fallback, in general, is good for now and the future:
> 
> Why - we could simply use the arch default one.

Emm.. I'm not sure, but I think there might be a chance that
COMMAND_LINE_SIZE extend in the future. In general 8K is safe to use,
because the current greatest one is 4K.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/