linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: Only pin GP kthread when full dynticks is actually used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140613125543.GD6635@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:55:45 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Only pin GP kthread when full dynticks is actually
 used

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 07:05:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 06:24:32PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 02:16:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL may be enabled widely on distros nowadays but actual
> > > users should be a tiny minority, if actually any.
> > > 
> > > Also there is a risk that affining the GP kthread to a single CPU could
> > > end up noticeably reducing RCU performances and increasing energy
> > > consumption.
> > > 
> > > So lets affine the GP kthread only when nohz full is actually used
> > > (ie: when the nohz_full= parameter is filled or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=y)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 10 +++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > > index cbc2c45..726f52c 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > > @@ -2843,12 +2843,16 @@ static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > >   */
> > >  static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> > >  {
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > > -	int cpu = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> > > +	int cpu;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	cpu = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> > > 
> > >  	if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > >  		return;
> > > +
> > >  	if (raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)
> > >  		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
> > > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> > >  }
> > 
> > Hello, Frederic,
> > 
> > I have the following queued.  Shall I port yours on top of mine, or is
> > there an issue with mine?
> 
> OK, I suppose I should show you what it looks like ported on top of mine.

No need to keep my patch as long as yours goes in. It fixes all the issue.

> 
> I didn't understand the removal of "#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL", so I
> left that.

Yeah that's because the:

      if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
           return;

returns unconditionally if CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=n. So the whole function
becomes dead code that should be detected and removed by gcc. So same
result as with the ifdef.

> I also didn't understand how dumping the GP kthreads onto
> a single CPU could affect energy efficiency all that much, so I omitted
> that from the commit log.  If I am missing something, please enlighten me.

Because if the kthread is pinned to CPU 0 and a grace period is in progress,
the kthread is going to disturb the CPU 0 regardless of its possibly deep sleep
state. OTOH if the kthread is widely affine, it can be scheduled to idle CPUs
that are less cold and thus wake them from less deep power state.

Well that all assuming that the scheduler takes care of these deep idle state.
But I believe it does iirc...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/