[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140613131720.GI8664@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:17:20 -0400
From: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony@...mide.com, santosh.shilimkar@...com, nm@...com,
rnayak@...com, linux@....linux.org.uk, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 16/19] irqchip: crossbar: introduce
ti,max-crossbar-sources to identify valid crossbar mapping
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:24:52PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> On Thursday 12 June 2014 07:24 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:23:24PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
...
> >> + of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,max-crossbar-sources",
> >> + &cb->max_crossbar_sources);
> >> + if (!cb->max_crossbar_sources) {
> >> + pr_err("missing 'ti,max-crossbar-sources' property\n");
> >> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >> + goto err_base;
> >> + }
> >
> > This completely breaks all boards using old dtbs. Please set
> > max_crossbar_sources to a sane value (400) when the property is missing.
> >
> >> +
> >> of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,max-irqs", &max);
> >> if (!max) {
> >> pr_err("missing 'ti,max-irqs' property\n");
> >
> > I know this is context, but you may want to look at this property as
> > well and set it to a sane value instead of erroring out.
> >
> crossbar dts node itself is not there in any dts yet. So this is not applicable
> for any old boards. Any future dts with crossbar node should have this property
> defined.
Now that I see the dra7.dtsi changes, I fully agree.
thx,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists