linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/12] 3.15.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <539B244B.7060000@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:18:19 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@...il.com,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.15 00/12] 3.15.1-stable review

On 06/13/2014 09:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:16:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 06/12/2014 04:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.15.1 release.
>>> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sat Jun 14 23:20:28 UTC 2014.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 143 pass: 135 skipped: 5 fail: 3
>> Failed builds:
>> 	powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.23)
>> 	powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.24)
>> 	unicore32:defconfig
>
> Are these powerpc build failures to be expected?  I'm guessing that
> unicore32 just never has built properly, right?
>

For powerpc, yes. Ben is working on a patch to fix the problem, which turns out
to be tricky.

unicore32 - correct, it doesn't build at least since 3.0. The maintainer submitted
a set of patches to Linus to fix the problem a couple of weeks ago, but for some
reason Linus doesn't accept it. I guess it will be up to Linus and the unicore
maintainer to decide the fate of the architecture. I don't want to drop the build;
this way people are and will be painfully aware that there is an architecture which
did not build for at least 15 releases.

[ Not that score is any better, really, but I have no means to build it. ]

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/