linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] OF: fix of_find_node_by_path() assumption that of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <539B2B7F.8010900@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:49:03 -0700
From:	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC:	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] OF: fix of_find_node_by_path() assumption that of_allnodes
 is root

On 6/13/2014 6:52 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...ymobile.com>
>>
>> Pantelis Antoniou reports that of_find_node_by_path() is borked because
>> of_allnodes is not guaranteed to contain the root of the tree after using
>> any of the dynamic update functions because some other nodes ends up as
>> of_allnodes.
>>
>> Fixes: c22e650e66b8 of: Make of_find_node_by_path() handle /aliases
> 
> Is it not possible to do a fix in of_find_node_by_path instead? I just

Yes, the code for that is in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/20/758

Or as Grant said in his reply, just use the fix in of_attach_node() for
now since he is going to replace the custom list.

> wonder if this could have any other unintended side-effects on
> of_attach_node's behavior.
> 
> Rob
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...ymobile.com>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Pantelis,
>>
>> Can you test whether the problem you reported in irc?
>>
>> This patch has not been tested, not even compile tested.
>>
>>
>>  drivers/of/base.c |    8       6 +     2 -     0 !
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: b/drivers/of/base.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -1948,6 +1948,9 @@ int of_reconfig_notify(unsigned long act
>>
>>  /**
>>   * of_attach_node - Plug a device node into the tree and global list.
>> + *
>> + * Put the device node after of_allnodes in the global list so that
>> + * of_allnodes remains the root.
>>   */
>>  int of_attach_node(struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>> @@ -1958,11 +1961,12 @@ int of_attach_node(struct device_node *n
>>         if (rc)
>>                 return rc;
>>
>> +       BUG_ON(!of_allnodes);
>>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
>>         np->sibling = np->parent->child;
>> -       np->allnext = of_allnodes;
>> +       np->allnext = of_allnodes->allnext;
>>         np->parent->child = np;
>> -       of_allnodes = np;
>> +       of_allnodes->allnext = np;
>>         of_node_clear_flag(np, OF_DETACHED);
>>         raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
>>
> .
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/