linux-kernel - Re: mm/sched/net: BUG when running simple code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <539A77A1.60700@oracle.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:01:37 -0400
From:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To:	Dan Aloni <dan@...nelim.com>
CC:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: mm/sched/net: BUG when running simple code

On 06/12/2014 11:27 PM, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > 
>> > Okay, I'm really lost. I got the following when fuzzing, and can't really explain what's
>> > going on. It seems that we get a "unable to handle kernel paging request" when running
>> > rather simple code, and I can't figure out how it would cause it.
> [..]
>> > Which agrees with the trace I got:
>> > 
>> > [  516.309720] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffa0f12560
>> > [  516.309720] IP: netlink_getsockopt (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2271)
> [..]
>> > [  516.309720] RIP netlink_getsockopt (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2271)
>> > [  516.309720]  RSP <ffff8803fc85fed8>
>> > [  516.309720] CR2: ffffffffa0f12560
>> > 
>> > They only theory I had so far is that netlink is a module, and has gone away while the code
>> > was executing, but netlink isn't a module on my kernel.
> The RIP - 0xffffffffa0f12560 is in the range (from Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt):
> 
>     ffffffffa0000000 - ffffffffff5fffff (=1525 MB) module mapping space
> 
> So seems it was in a module.

Yup, that's why that theory came up, but when I checked my config:

$ cat .config | grep NETLINK
CONFIG_COMPAT_NETLINK_MESSAGES=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_ACCT=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_LOG=y
CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK=y
CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_TIMEOUT=y
CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_HELPER=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE_CT=y
CONFIG_NETLINK_MMAP=y
CONFIG_NETLINK_DIAG=y
CONFIG_SCSI_NETLINK=y
CONFIG_QUOTA_NETLINK_INTERFACE=y

that theory went away. (also confirmed by not finding a netlink module.)

What about the kernel .text overflowing into the modules space? The loader
checks for that, but can something like that happen after everything is
up and running? I'll look into that tomorrow.


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/