[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430FE1F8BB11@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:28:54 -0700
From: Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch V2] wireless: mwifiex: Use the proper interfaces
> > + u32 queue_delay = ktime_to_ms(net_timedelta(skb->tstamp));
>
> FWIW, I think the same as patch 12 applies here. net_timedelta() doesn't
> really seem to be a good way to calculate time deltas.
Shall we change net_timedelta to ktime_sub() using ktime_get()?
+ u32 queue_delay = ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), skb->tstamp));
Thanks,
Bing
>
> And yes - I've seen situations where this matters, e.g. when running
> ntpdate after system startup.
>
> johannes
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists