[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140613200405.GA12362@ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:04:05 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] tools: Revamp the unaligned endian access
functions
> >
> > A much simpler approach without any fallback to arch specific
> > version etc. is everything we need.
>
> It doesn't matter so much for things that are just done for the kernel
> compile, no, but there are some tools that are built to be used as
> standalone things, and it could matter there.
Which tools require 452 lines of codes for a simple set of
le/be wrappers?
In other words - which tool will benefit from the addition speedup
this amount of code gives?
If I as a naive user look in unaligned.h I do not even see
a prototype of the available methods. I am thrown to a directory
with no less than 12 files.
The le_direct.h´+ be_direct.h files seems unused.
So again - why is it not enaough to provide only le_byteshift.h
+ the be counterpart?
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists