[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <539A890A.5090206@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:15:54 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Russ Cox <rsc@...ang.org>,
Ian Taylor <iant@...ang.org>
Subject: Re: vdso feature requests from the Go people
On 06/12/2014 09:36 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> If we were to implement both, maybe we'd actually want to provide
> something like:
>
> struct vdso_entry {
> unsigned long vdso_entry_struct_size; /* so we can add fields later on */
> void *func;
> unsigned int max_stack; /* zero if not known */
> };
>
How different is this really from the .dynsym table -- other than that
you have to find the latter via the dynamic segment?
The hash part is just to speed up lookup...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists