linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] sched,numa: further numa balancing fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1402773539-6466-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:18:56 -0400
From:	riel@...hat.com
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
	chegu_vinod@...com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] sched,numa: further numa balancing fixes

A few more bug fixes that seem to improve convergence of
"perf bench numa mem -m -0 -P 1000 -p X -t Y" for various
values of X and Y, on both 4 and 8 node systems.

This does not address the issue I highlighted Friday:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/13/529

I have an idea on how to fix that issue, but implementing
that as part of this series would be silly, since I would
have to rip the code back out and completely rewrite it
once I started working on placement for systems with complex
NUMA topologies. Better to leave that code for then...

Patches are against the latest -next and -tip trees.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/