[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <539BAF40.4060800@elopez.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 23:11:12 -0300
From: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
To: Nick <xerofoify@...il.com>
CC: mturquette@...aro.org, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes two memory leaks in drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
Hi,
El 13/06/14 22:47, Nick escribió:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> index 4264834..07b45d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> @@ -41,9 +41,11 @@ static void __init sun4i_osc_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> const char *clk_name = node->name;
> u32 rate;
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &rate))
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &rate)) {
> + kfree(fixed);
> + kfree(gate);
Why are you trying to free these two, when they haven't been allocated yet?
> return;
> -
> + }
> /* allocate fixed-rate and gate clock structs */
> fixed = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_fixed_rate), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!fixed)
>
fixed is allocated here. gate follows suit after it.
Cheers,
Emilio
PS: For next time, please use a proper prefix on your patch subject
("clk: sunxi: " in this case) as well as add a description to your patch
and a signoff line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists