lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 14 Jun 2014 02:27:10 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <>
To:	George Spelvin <>
Subject: Re: random: Benchamrking fast_mix2

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 01:25:27AM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> > When I did a quick comparison of your 64-bit fast_mix2 variant, it's
> > much slower than either the 32-bit fast_mix2, or the original fast_mix
> > alrogithm.
> That is f***ing *bizarre*.  For me, it's *significantly* faster.
> You *are* compiling -m64, right?  Because I agree with you it'd
> be stupid to try to use it on 32-bit machines.

Sorry for not being clear.  My results are similar to yours with -m64.
It was much slower when compiled with -m32.  (Which may have been
obvious, but one of the things I've learned very early on with
benchmarking is you measure, and don't assume, whenever possible....)

	     	    	     	       	       - Ted
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists