[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1402734615.2756.7.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 01:30:15 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, benoit.taine@...6.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Attempt to find unnecessary 'out of
memory' messages
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 09:40 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> With a semantic patch that searches for the various calls and then a
> string containing the letters "emory", I get removals of the messages
> below. Do any of these messages look useful? For example, some are
> generated with specific functions, such as IRDA_ERROR or BT_ERR. If none
> of the messages look useful, should just one big patch go to trivial, or
> should the patches go to the individual maintainers?
>
> julia
Hi Julia.
There was no attachment or "below" for your email.
I expect that these should go first to individual
maintainers, then after that and a kernel release
later, then to trivial.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists