[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lnjrop$mlp$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:15:34 +0200
From: Stijn Volckaert <svolckae@...s.ugent.be>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vdso feature requests from the Go people
Andy Lutomirski schreef op 13/06/2014 17:34:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:39 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 06/12/2014 09:36 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. Parsing the vDSO is a PITA. What if we bundled the reference
>>> parser inside the vdso? Concretely, we could have AT_VDSO_FINDENTRY
>>> point to a function like:
>>>
>>> void *vdso_find_entry(const char *name, const char *version)
>>>
>>> Then things like Go and maybe even musl (and klibc?) could just call
>>> that function. And we'd never have to worry about maintaining
>>> compatibility with more and more weird vdso parsers.
>>>
>>> Implementing this could be as simple as shoving parse_vdso.c into the
>>> vdso, although vdso2c could help and allow a really simple in-vdso
>>> implementation.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not really sure how much of a win that is... you have to parse
>> *something*, and for the vast majority of all implementations there will
>> be a dynamic linker just sitting there, and that is what it *does*.
>
> I'm only aware of two implementations that work like that: glibc and
> musl. AFAIK neither one even tries to use the vdso when statically
> linked. IIRC, Bionic doesn't support the vdso at all, and Go has the
> present issue.
Glibc DOES use the VDSO even when it's statically linked. It uses the
AT_SYSINFO_EHDR it gets from the kernel to find the VDSO and it will
find any syms it needs dynamically.
--Stijn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists